THE “OSAMA-SICKLE”
THE FAIRY TALES START AGAIN…
Osama bin Laden’s death, who do you believe?
-
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
BBC WORLD SERVICE WITH VETERANS TODAY’S ALAN SABROSKY AND GORDON DUFF DISCUSSING THE “DEATH” OF OSAMA BIN LADEN
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
The incident this week in Abbottabad, Pakistan was always intended to be “self-discrediting.” In a time of rigged voting machines and rule by decree, a time of military tribunals and tortured defendants, the concept of evidence and accountability is a joke. Consider the current bin Laden farce what it was intended to be, the American government reminding its people and the people of the world how little respect it has for them.
There is no need for conspiracy theory, no need for talk of hoaxes, we have gone far beyond that. Evidence of bin Laden’s death being covered up by the Bush administration is, not only overwhelming, but long ago entered the public domain.
As the hours pass and reality soaks in, a more serious question arises; “Why now?”
Newshounds and insiders are aware that Wikileaks has been proven to have ties to an intelligence organization hostile to, not just Iran and Pakistan but the United States as well. Though the story broke last summer, it wasn’t until early December, 2010 that Zbigniew Brzezinski provided confirmation. So when Wikileaks, only a few days ago, announced that a nuclear weapon had been placed “underneath” a major European target by “Al Qaeda” to be detonated upon the capture of Osama bin Laden, a man most knew to be dead for a decade, “insiders” became both fearful and vigilant.
Real insiders are far more wary of threats from Wikileaks than “Al Qaeda.” Wikileak threats come true, is that, just perhaps, because they come from people capable of making them come true?
Two things happened:
- Intelligence agencies across Europe went on full alert, searching for a nuclear weapon
- A vigil began, seeing how many hours before Osama bin Laden’s corpse would be “killed” in a heroic episode of “counter-terrorism” that would also be used to damn Pakistan.
The idea of bin Laden’s death has settled in. The factions have taken stock, conspiracy theorists, the government apologists and disinformationalists and the professionals. Years ago, top military and intel insiders had all agreed bin Laden died in late 2001. The CIA’s director, Leon Panetta, now Secretary of Defense stated, flat out, that nothing had been heard of bin Laden since “late 2001.” By saying this, he indicated with categorical certainty, that all supposed Al Qaeda or bin Laden statements since that time were deemed “unreliable” by the CIA.
Expect video of bin Laden’s killing to be released, medals to be given out, backs to be slapped and, as usual, pockets to be lined. The videos could be as old as the frozen corpse of bin Laden himself, dumped into the Indian Ocean.
There has been little out of Washington DC since the “world domination” cabal, PNAC (Project for a New American Century) or the Brzezinski “World Chessboard” counterparts outlined the need for a “Pearl Harbour scale” event with a “cardboard cutout” boogeyman to act as backdrop for re-engineering the face of the planet. After the “event,” we would see the seizure of Central Asia’s hydrocarbon resources, the collapse of the world’s monetary systems and a political upheaval to spread across the world that would leave ever political institution in every country vulnerable to the dictates of an unseen “globalist” hand.
Is there any surprise that the “reported” killing of Osama bin Laden has not been accepted in the United States as more than “ho hum” news? First off, the wingnuts have created a new Obama conspiracy and, as usual, they have gotten it totally wrong. The staging of the bin Laden “street theatre” has far more ominous consequences than the simple manipulation of public opinion in the United States.
Now, out from under rocks, from the deepest recesses of the political world, the long discredited characters like Donald Rumsfeld, are now crawling out into the sunlight, fabricating wild conspiracy tales to support their criminal acts, the kidnapping, murder and torture that they inflicted on the world on a scale not seen since the death of Adolf Hitler.
Let’s not let facts get in the way.
First of all, for those of you who don’t know it, bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11, was charged with nothing about it. Secondly, the criminal charges against bin Laden were not backed by any evidence, not enough for an honest indictment.
Osama bin Laden was a CIA fundraiser with no experience whatsoever in terrorist activities, military planning, weapons, explosives or leading people. Furthermore, Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator (and VT staff writer) had, during her employment, seen documents verifying Osama bin Laden’s continued service to the United States, even on 9/11/2001. He was assisting the CIA in funding covert operations while the World Trade Center was being demolished and the documents prove it.
The reports released to the public, beginning with the falsified “death photo” published by the Associated Press to the stories of bin Laden using his wife as a “human shield” are, each, wilder than the rest. Each story is carefully calculated to misdirect attention from real questions of import. Asking how real or imaginary bin Laden, most likely no more alive than a chicken leg after a microwave defrost cycle, “acted” when confronted by 25 Navy Seals is no more valid than those dedicated to 9/11 Truth bickering about explosive compounds that brought down Building 7 when the real issues of who was responsible are allowed to “slip away” unnoticed like a thief in the night.
What can we say about Osama bin Laden? He is certainly dead now and has, in all probability, been dead for a decade. We can also expect that his “public” death will act a a harbinger of misfortune for the world, heralding a period of long calculated destabilization aimed at Pakistan and Iran, but ultimately striking the heart of America and NATO.
What we can expect is an act of carefully staged “false flag” revenge.
The frozen body of Osama bin Laden, very real “currency,” would not have been spent on less.
Filed under 9/11 – War on Terror, America at War · Tagged with al-qaeda, alex jones, bush, cheney, cia, dirty bomb, duff, gazza, gordon, gordon duff, hamid gul, iraq, ISI, israel, Leon Panetta, Osama bin Laden, pakistan, reumsfeld
More questionable reporting comes from the Washington Post. This is the lead line in their front page coverage today:
On Sept. 11, 2001, the core of al-Qaeda was concentrated in a single city: Karachi, Pakistan.
But we though Osama bin Laden planned it all, over a period of years, in Afghanistan. Is there a reason to “deflect” attention from bin Laden, now known to have been dead for so many years despite the continual release of video and now audio tapes by the Israeli news agency SITE Intelligence?
According to the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States, the last bin Laden transcript included the following statement (from a classified CIA archive):
- “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States.”
- “Neither I had any knowledge of these attacks nor I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. . Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people. Such a practice is forbidden ever in the course of a battle.” (Central Intelligence Agency Official Translation)
UPI’s Editor, Arnaud de Borchgrave says the following regarding the death of Osama bin Laden:
CIA Director Leon Panetta said in early July that the intelligence agency hadn’t been able to positively confirm any specific information on the uber-terrorist since “late 2001.” And all those audio and video tapes broadcast by the Qatar-based Al Jazeera global television network? Clever Israeli forgeries, says Duff.
Many other voices in cyberspace claim the bin Laden myth is kept “alive” to justify the Afghan war and the global war on terror.
Angelo Codevilla, who teaches international relations at Boston University, is a former U.S. intelligence officer who studied Soviet disinformation techniques during the Cold War. He says a close examination of all the alleged bin Laden tapes, including the videos, have convinced him that Elvis Presley is more alive than Osama bin Laden.
By all accounts from those who knew him prior to 9/11, bin Laden was a deeply religious man and his early tapes after 9/11 were sprinkled with references to God and the Prophet Muhammad. Not so the later ones, which were subsequently analyzed by some experts who said they were professional forgeries.
The last time credible intercepts of bin Laden’s voice were made by overhead satellites in early December 2001 as he was escaping through the Tora Bora mountain range from Afghanistan to the sanctuary of Pakistan’s tribal areas.
With bin Laden dead, is there a Wikileaks “agenda” to put Pakistan under the gun, particularly after reports tying admitted murderer Raymond Davis to an Indian/Israeli terrorist cell working with the Taliban. Pakistan’s advanced missile program and new “nuclear capable’ long range bombers may be seen as a threat to moves in the region if Paksitan-American relations continue to cool.
The biggest giveaway is the return to attacks on Pakistan and her intelligence services. This seems to be the greatest area of Wikileaks bias. The Daily Beast reports:
Pakistan Intelligence Service Labeled as Terrorism
A damning document that surely won’t help strained relationships between the U.S. and Pakistan: The main Pakistani intelligence service, ISI, was listed by American authorities as a terrorist organization—on par with al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah. “Through associations” with these groups, the documents say, the ISI was linked to “terrorist or insurgent activity.”
However, the Economic Times reports, only two weeks ago:
WASHINGTON: Pakistani spy master Lt. Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha flew into Washington for what an official called a “frank discussion” with Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director Leon Panetta on the strained US-Pakistan relationship.
CIA spokesman Preston Golson called the discussions between Pasha and Panetta “productive” and said the “CIA-ISI relationship remains on solid footing.”
In fact, the “damning document” referred to by Newsweek is one of dozens carefully “seeded” into Wikileaks and equally “seeded” into the Newsweek story.
Yes, the documents are “damning” but more for Newsweek, Israel and Julian Assange.
General Mirza Aslam Beg, former Chief of Staff, Army of Paksitan, said this in an article in Veterans Today:
The Wikileaks revelations confirm the obvious, more than what it informs us about the darker corners of ‘US diplomacy, cloaked in securitocracy.’ In fact, it is Cyber War, in the new game of psy-warfare, targeting individuals and countries, to cover-up the shame of defeat of war on Afghanistan, war on Iraq and 2006 Israeli war on Lebanon. The cyber war has been launched, impacting public opinion globally, and focusing on three objectives mainly:
1.To cause defamation of the countries which have had a role, direct or indirect, in the defeat of the Americans and their allies, in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, and create mistrust amongst them, so that they are not able to challenge future American plans in the region.
2.To create conditions for a civil war in Afghanistan and out of the chaos and confusion, reduce Pakistan and Iran to subservience, something they have not been able to achieve during the last thirty years.
3. To establish Indian hegemony over South Asia, including Afghanistan, and project American strategic interests in the region.
The technique used in making these revelations is typical of psy operations approach, of mixing truth with lies in a manner that truth tends to get submerged under the lies, as is the case here. The report has not said a word about Israel, nor it gives any disadvantage to US in the implementation of policies in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and other Muslim countries, which have been particularly targeted. The Wikileaks betrays the role of a country with resources to break the secret code of US diplomatic order, because it is not possible for an individual like Julian Assange, the fugitive, to accomplish such high profile task. The report, no doubt, has created ripples around the world, but will subside as it is looked into with a deeper perspective, regarding its source, intent and purpose.
WASHINGTON POST GOES “NUTTER” ON BIN LADEN
Mixed with Wikileaks “chickenfeed” and unsubstantiated reports of the heinous acts of every nation but Israel (despite Julian Assange’s assertion that he would publish “dirt” on Israel many months ago) is wild conjecture steamed up by the papers themselves. Worst of all is the Washington Post.
Mixing Wikileaks with unsupported and unfounded text, the Post buries themselves in their attempt to establish Osama bin Laden as “alive and well” in Pakistan, a position they have taken with no sources, not even Wikileak material.
The Post is simply “making it all up.”
Here, from the Post:
According to the documents, four days after the Sept. 11 attacks, bin Laden visited a guesthouse in Afghanistan’s Kandahar province. He told the Arab fighters gathered there “to defend Afghanistan against the infidel invaders” and to “fight in the name of Allah.”
It was beginning of a peripatetic three months for bin Laden and Zawahiri. Traveling by car among several locations in Afghanistan, bin Laden handed out assignments to his followers, met with some of the Taliban leadership and delegated control of al-Qaeda to the group’s Shura Council, presumably because he feared being captured or killed as U.S. forces closed in.
Here the Post attempts to cover its “behind” by cutting off contact with bin Laden after his death on December 14, 2001. Note that the use of “according to documents” doesn’t reference Wikileaks or provide any references as to whether the documents they are using are ones they wrote themselves, which, in fact, they are.
They go on:
Bin Laden, accompanied by Zawahiri and a handful of close associates in his security detail, escaped to his cave complex in Tora Bora in November. Around Nov. 25, he was seen giving a speech to the leaders and fighters at the complex.
According to the documents, bin Laden and his deputy escaped from Tora Bora in mid-December 2001. At the time, the al-Qaeda leader was apparently so strapped for cash that he borrowed $7,000 from one of his protectors — a sum he paid back within a year.
Yes, bin Laden escaped, and I’ll bet he hasn’t paid back the $7,000 he borrowed. Invented details like the $7000 loan are a ploy to add credibility to phony story. Spies, when being trained to plant false information, are told to add colorful details to “sell” their disinformation.
This is exactly what the Washington Post is doing. The idea of Osama bin Laden, even after his death, borrowing money is absurd for so many reasons.
Here is more from the Washington Post:
The place was teeming with fighters who were awaiting for al-Qaeda to return their passports so they could flee across the border to Pakistan.
What part of “fleeing to Pakistan” involves a Passport? Weren’t we told that there were hundreds of unguarded mountain passes that made the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan one of the most porous in the World? Is it because terrorists hiding from the authorities in Pakistan want to be caught with a passport that proves they “fled” from Afghanistan? Would a terrorist travel dozens of miles an official border checkpoint, all supervised by the CIA and ISI, in order to be questioned?
Shouldn’t the Post be more careful when making things up?
But there’s more and it gets even better:
There are few geographic references in the documents for bin Laden after his flight into Pakistan. He apparently sent out letters from his hiding place through a trusted courier, who then handed them to Libbi, who had provided the secret guesthouse in Kabul immediately after the Sept. 11 attacks.In May 2005, while waiting for bin Laden’s courier at a drop point, Libi was arrested by Pakistani special forces.
Here, the post, not even citing “documents” simply wings it, bringing “Elvis” bin Laden back from the dead, placing him in Pakistan and attributing him a zombie-like existence in an ethereal world with “few geographic references” until he faded from memory.
LIBYA, ISRAEL AND WIKILEAKS
Perhaps the most controversial and most revealing of the Wikileaks involves Libya. Colonel Gaddafi had been seen as one of the great threats against Israel but, curiously, no pressure against Gaddafi had been placed on the US by Israel, even when Gaddafi had engaged in acts of terror. Then, with a revolt in full force against Gaddafi in the offing, Israeli papers report that he turned to Israel for military aid against his own people.
YouTube – Veterans Today -
Newsweek, in its unattributed article today included the following:
From Gitmo to Leading Libya’s Rebels
One notable Guantanano inmate in the files is Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda Bin Qumu, a captive in the prison for five years who had been deemed a “probable member of al Qaeda” by the U.S. But now his relationship to America is a more complex: Qumu, a native of Libya, is now a leading figure among that’s country’s rebel fighters against Col. Gaddafi. His Gitmo assessment says he has a “non-specific personality disorder.”
A recurring and yet unsupported claim from certain circles in the US closely aligned with Israel is that insurgent forces in Libya are led by Al Qaeda. Most telling, however, aren’t the unsubstantiated reports, but rather who is making them. The question is, not whether Al Qaeda is in Libya or not. Al Qaeda simply doesn’t exist, except in the media and when defense and security agencies around the world are asking for money or dodging having to explain for their involvement in the worldwide heroin trade that has grown up in Afghanistan under NATO occupation.
Primary ‘water carrier’ for the phony Al Qaeda reports on Libya is Admiral James Stavridis, top American commander in Europe. Stavridis is also Israel’s “monkeyboy” in the US military. From the Telegraph:
STAVRIDIS AND HIS WIFE IN TEL AVIV
Admiral James Stavridis, Nato’s Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, said that American intelligence had picked up “flickers” of terrorist activity among the rebel groups. Senior British government figures described the comment as “very alarming”.
Stavridis is a constant visitor to Tel Aviv and is considered Israel’s biggest supporter among America’s top military commanders. One must also note that it is both Stavridis and Wikileaks that are “tasked” with characterizing the “Arab Spring” in Libya whose entire NATO support mechanism is under Stavridis’ personal command as infiltrated by ‘terrorists.’
Why is Admiral Stavridis undermining the mission of his own command? Why is he telling American forces that they are, according to his beliefs, supporting terrorism?
How is Stavridis keeping his job?
THE WIKI-CABAL
In our latest Wikileak, they are returning to their roots, a rehash of the America bashing of the Iraq video, a rehash of their attacks on Pakistan, seeded with key elements of Israel’s disinformation agenda.
What does this current campaign, and we have to call it that, either “disinformation,” or “psyop,” attempt to accomplish?
Wikileaks has never mentioned nuclear threats before. There is no intelligence that ties any terrorist organization to a potential nuclear attack on the US or Europe but there are reports of a “false flag” agenda by Israel to push the United States into attacking Iran. There is a very real nuclear weapons security alert around the world but it has nothing to do with Al Qaeda as this story from Veterans Today tells us:
When “lost nuke” recovery team leader Valerie Plame was framed by Republicans close to President Bush, was this to cover Bush or Tony Blair or Israel. The Plame “outing” puts the lost nukes in Israel. None of the other possible countries that could be holding the weapons would get White House protection. Plame got too close but couldn’t be murdered like Dr. David Kelly, not with a husband that had the kind of political connections that Plame has.
There is only one reason for a threat of nuclear terrorism and only one agenda it would support, one long backed by Israel and Wikileaks, the invasion of Iran by the United States, something that would never be considered under any circumstances less than a nuclear attack.
Thus, this is the top of Wikileaks agenda and in turn, the top of Israel’s wishlist.
With Israel’s partnership with India in the development of long range missiles capable of striking, not only China but the United States as well, Israsel/Wikileaks is paying a debt or perhaps making an investment in returning to attacks on Pakistan.
Intelligence sources at the highest levels of, not only Pakistan, but the United States as well, place full complicity in the endless and deadly terrorist attacks inside Pakistan by the Taliban on, not only India’s RAW but Israel’s Mossad as well. These attacks, primarily aimed at destabilizing Pakistan, India’s “blood enemy,” have also spilled over into Afghanistan and caused the deaths of dozens of Americans.
It has been Wikileak’s job to try to tie Pakistan’s ISI to the same Taliban forces they are actively fighting, forces that have killed hundreds in Pakistan over the past year alone. In fact, Pakistan’s influence in Afghanistan is nil, their relations with their own Pashtun population and the Pashtun majority in Afghanistan permanently stained by Pakistan’s seeming complicity in US drone attacks that have killed hundreds of innocent civilians.
Wikileaks characterization of the situation on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan, is not only inaccurate but, even by propaganda standards, disturbingly inept.
The oddest lesson of the recent Wikileak is confirmation of suspicions that Libya and Israel have been maintaining a covert alliance for years, one kept secret by Colonel Gaddafi, whose blusterous pronouncements have fooled many into believing him to be a genuine advocate for Palestinian rights.
If anything, those seeking insights into the secret alliances and layered “subtext” of the secret world see Wikileaks as a gift.
For those with the skills and attention span, Wikileaks is a “hardwired” connection into the world of spies and deceit.
Ah, as for those paying for it, this week we learned that General Electric, you know, the guys who really own NBC and a bunch of other stuff, made $14 billion in profit last year and didn’t pay a single cent of income tax.
The typical MacDonalds employee pays about $400 bucks out of a paycheck that puts their yearly income at half the poverty level. There are street musicians living in cardboard boxes who pay more in taxes than GE.
What does America do for GE? Most of their income comes at the largess of the American taxpayer and American troops. For those who are unaware, all across America, major corporations haven’t just been moved off the tax rolls like “dead people,” but also pay greatly reduced utilities, state and local taxes and, most enjoyable of all, less and less in wages and benefits.
The tax hiatus corporate America has been on since the Reagan years, with most disappearing from any fiscal participation in America at all under “Bush the lesser,” has turned corporate America into the biggest pack of welfare cheats and freeloaders on earth. One city benefits, of course, and that is Washington. They are having a virtual orgasm, if creatures there are capable of such things, at the influx of cash, first Israel kicking back part of the billions in foreign aid and other defense related “off the books” subsidies we give the world’s richest nation and now, the chiseling corporate world is giving them a run for their money.
It must be hard for members of congress.
“First its Israel, they have the emails I sent that high school kid when I was drunk. Oh, and Gaddafi’s boys left a briefcase full of cash in my wife’s car. Briefcase, how ’80′s of them. Can’t they find someone to hire my wife to do something. All I hear when I get home every day…’Clarence Thomas got his wife a job and I make a lousy 200 grand a year teaching kids how to smoke cigarettes.’ “
That reminds me, I try to put a something fun and worthwhile into these Sunday things. I was just reading Paul Sheridan’s piece on Israel’s “terror attack” last week, and the more than minor signs that it was staged, a “magic bullet” as it were, managing to kill a lone Christian Evangelist and British citizen at a very convenient time too, when forces were in place for another Gaza “smackdown.” There had been attacks on Gaza all along, Ken O’Keefe has been reporting the nightly “Luftwaffe” blitz on Gaza that is laundered from the media.
Before I forget, there are a couple of “gems” in this week’s “Libya/CIA” piece. Look for 4 or 5 items, a couple on the video, that qualify as “way beyond Wikileaks” material.
Anyway, we had drifted off to the “magic bullet” of Israel, busy competing for news space while Libya is going on, actually, Libya, Bahrain, Niger, Yemen, Jordan, Syria…
Secretary Gates tells us Gaddafi is killing rebels and planting their bodies at sites of NATO bombings. A bit ago, a family of 5 was found dead in Israel. Funny thing, here in America, families are found dead all the time, the same story over and over, “murder-suicide.”
There are no “murder-suicides” in Israel, no car wrecks, no armed robberies. Everything is a terror attack. Hey, Secretary Gates, it isn’t just Gaddafi that plays games with dead people. We learned that years ago when some of the dead in a Tel Aviv bus explosion blamed on a Palestinian suicide bomber weren’t entirely thawed out yet. Not everyone has a short memory.
Thus, in a circuitous way, we reach back into the past to the Kennedy killings and the great “why?” Why was Teddy Kennedy allowed to live when, as General Gaddafi has told the world, people from “that special country” were responsible for murdering John and Bobby Kennedy.
YouTube – Veterans Today -
For decades now, Chappaquiddick has been a rallying cry for conservatives. Films, books and articles depicting the Kennedy family as gangster, even murders as in the case of Marilyn Monroe, have flowed out of, well where? Some wear the obvious labels of right wing extremism and the Israel lobby, “Heritage Foundation” is a favorite. Others appear out of nowhere, part of a campaign to continually resell the Dallas killing with the same marketing that is used on 9/11…tell the same lie, tell it big and tell it often.
The “big lie” that gets played the most is Chappaquiddick, the “car accident” where Ted Kennedy supposedly drives off a bridge, dead drunk, and Mary Jo Kopechne ends up dead. The year was 1969. Bobby Kennedy, a virtual shoo-in for president was murdered by, well, certainly not by Sirhan Sirhan, we know that for sure.
The two most likely reasons for the destruction of the Kennedy family are its opposition to nuclear weapons in the Middle East, which required that Israel dismantle its program and, one less public, an end to the Federal Reserve system, the largely foreign controlled banks that have maintained an unconstitutional stranglehold over American financial life and, as we see now, may well have ended that life.
Both are equally “Israel” issues. Federal Reserve is neither “federal” nor does it “reserve’ anything. The Federal Reserve is the Rothschilds, to a large extent anyway.
Ted Kennedy could never be murdered, lightning had already struck too many times. It would be like crashing a plane into the Sears Tower (or whatever it is called now) and sending an army into the oil rich areas of Canada looking for a hockey team “gone Taliban.”
The entire “War on Terror” is another of those “curlycue” bullet bullet things like from Dallas or another 9/11 Building 7 “thingies.”
Kennedy had to be discredited. He knew why his brothers were killed and he blamed Israel. He wasn’t blind the the USS Liberty and Israel’s hold on Lyndon Johnson and he wanted blood. Setting him up was easy. Kennedy was drugged, kidnapped and woke up, well, you know the rest. Picture yourself there, then you can fill in all the blanks.
And guess who was there to help him get out of it. As intelligence operations go, this one was so obvious a moron could have figured it out. The Kennedy family would be destroyed, Henry Kissinger would be placed at the helm of American foreign policy. He would share the glory for ending Vietnam (sort of) and opening China.
There is a list, one that outlines the fall of American independence and the real end of constitutional democracy. Some folks today like to say America was never meant to be a democracy.
“You either iz or u ain’t. We got democracies and we got dictatorships, there ain’t no in betwixt.”
This is the short list:
John Kennedy was murdered over Dimona and the Federal Reserve.
George Wallace shot because there was no other way to control him.
Robert Kennedy murdered over suggesting a “balanced Middle East settlement.”
Ted Kennedy “set up” and blackmailed for life over Chappaquiddick. Israel fearful of revenge at hands of surviving Kennedy.
Richard Nixon “set up” and force out of office over Watergate.
William Fulbright (Senator, Chairman Senate Foreign Relations Committee) pushed out of office in a rigged primary by Dale Bumpers, dumb as he sounds. Fulbright opposed foreign lobbying in Washington.
Jimmie Carter victim of economic sabotage and a Bush “October Surprise.”
Ronald Reagan shot for pushing back at Israel. Whatever “Ronnie” was, nobody dictated to him. He was never a “Bush leaguer.”
Bill Clinton “set up” for pushing back at Israel.
John Kennedy Jr’s plane was “exploded” for “outing” Shin Bet’s part in the Rabin assassination, part of a larger operation leading directly to 9/11.
(8 year Israel rule of America)
Obama?
As a parting shot, I have to mention Libya one more time. Gaddafi has poured an estimated $80 million into Washington and New York in the last 30 days with promises of another $200 million to come and Gaddafi is known to pay his bills.
However, what he has failed to do is purchase both government and key “opinion makers” wholesale. His “literary agent” is too involved in his own career and failed to follow through on promises. This is genuinely embarrassing. Half of America’s Republicans are calling for Obama’s impeachment, claiming Gaddafi is a hero saving the world from Al Qaeda and the other half are calling for Gaddafi to be assassinated.
OK, we get the part where Obama is bad. Now, if we can only get the Gaddafi thing coordinated. Maybe there can be a compromise.
Perhaps the Republicans can have Gaddafi assassinated after he pays out the entire $280 million?
Just a thought…
Filed under America at War · Tagged with 9/11, al-qaeda, assassination, bush, gaddafi, Gaza, General Electric, gordon duff, ken o’keefe, kennedy, rabin, Reagan, rust belt, taxes, willian fulbright
Filed under America at War · Tagged with cia, Gaza, gordon duff, israel, jonathan pollard, NATO, netanyaho, nixon, Nuclear War, Palestinians, Reagan, Soviet Union
By Press TV US Desk
Running Head: Instructional Protocol/Sensitivity during Interaction with PTSD Sufferers